Why publish now
A result is easier to trust when the rules were visible first. Each report names what was measured or still needs to be measured, what remains unknown, which media can be used, how disagreement is preserved, and which claims stop publication.
That means a future null result still counts. It also prevents a convenient metric from becoming a platform claim after the charts are drawn.
Caption-event timing audit
When does meaningful on-screen text appear relative to speech, meaning, and the visual it explains?
Proposed scope Rights-cleared, multilingual caption events with accessibility review
Reading time 10 min read Read the report → Blinded 100-opening teardown
How quickly can a first-time reviewer reconstruct the subject, topic, promise, or tension from an opening?
Proposed scope 100 rights-cleared openings across five declared format strata
Reading time 11 min read Read the report → Silent-opening cue audit
How often could one coder identify a Short's premise from three opening stills without hearing the audio?
Observed scope 27 search-ranked Shorts; one coder; stills at 0.2, 1.5, and 2.8 seconds
Reading time 12 min read Read the report → Opening-language transcript pilot
What kind of information appeared in the first five recovered words of the sampled YouTube Shorts?
Observed scope 25 recovered auto-caption openings from the 27-video structural sample
Reading time 12 min read Read the report → Short-form text-placement safe-zone proxy audit
How often did primary opening text enter a conservative edge-band proxy, and what is required before calling that a platform safe-zone violation?
Observed scope 12 text-bearing openings from the 27-video pilot, checked against conservative edge bands
Reading time 12 min read Read the report → Longitudinal annotation benchmark
Where does the first reviewable structural problem appear, and can independent reviewers agree on it?
Proposed scope Rights-cleared short-form videos, phased pilot before any benchmark
Reading time 11 min read Read the report → Promise-proof-payoff annotation study
How far does a video travel between its opening promise, first proof, and primary payoff, and what happens in between?
Proposed scope Rights-cleared videos with event-level narrative annotation
Reading time 10 min read Read the report → Consented short-form recut case series and blinded viewer experiment
What changes after a preregistered structural recut, and how can viewer perception be separated from live platform distribution?
Proposed scope 20 creator-owned original/recut pairs plus separate randomized viewer panels
Reading time 14 min read Read the report → Distribution questions and creator decisions What creators infer after a weak result, what the evidence supports, and which next action remains testable.
Verified paired-outcome survey
What did creators change before reposting, and how did the second upload compare after baseline and natural variation were considered?
Proposed scope Creator-submitted original/repost pairs with matched analytics windows
Reading time 12 min read Read the report → Creator decision and evidence-alignment study
After an underperforming video, how closely does a creator's first action align with the evidence available at the time?
Proposed scope Consented creators with verified analytics, blinded review, and a follow-up survey
Reading time 12 min read Read the report → YouTube Shorts advice evidence audit
Which familiar YouTube Shorts advice claims have first-party grounding, and which turn context into unsupported universal rules?
Observed scope 20 recurring claims from five editorial pages, checked against current first-party guidance
Reading time 13 min read Read the report → Public zero-view resolution case pilot
What evidence is required before a reported recovery from zero views can be assigned a cause?
Observed scope Four de-identified public resolution anecdotes; future census target of 50 verified creator cases
Reading time 13 min read Read the report → Creator, expert, and analyzer diagnosis agreement protocol
Where do creators, independent experts, and a structural analyzer disagree about the weakest moment in a short-form video?
Proposed scope 50 creators, three blinded experts, own-video and unfamiliar-video tasks, analyzer scored separately
Reading time 14 min read Read the report → Viewer-confusion comment classifier feasibility test
Can a multilingual question-word lexicon identify comments that show viewers did not understand a video's premise?
Observed scope 471 newest top-level comments from ten sampled Shorts; nine lexical candidates manually reviewed
Reading time 12 min read Read the report → Stratified short-form structural benchmark protocol
How do observable short-form video structures vary by niche without turning descriptive medians into universal targets?
Proposed scope 600 videos across 12 pre-specified niches, with 50 independent channels per niche
Reading time 13 min read Read the report → Research boundary
Structure is observable. Performance still needs audience data. These reports can describe edits, annotations, survey responses, and reviewer agreement. They cannot expose a platform algorithm or promise views. Read the broader ViralJury methodology , or compare the distinction against the existing source-backed sample reports .